Greenpeace, a longstanding international organization committed to activism relating to environmental issues, has taken a firm stance against genetic engineering. Greenpeace feels that genetic engineering is detrimental to the well being of the earth and its inhabitants for a number of reasons. |
||
Their issues with GE... Biotech companies Greenpeace feels that Biotech companies care less about safety and the environment, and more about profitability of their products. They feel that it is wrong for a company like Monsanto to have numerous patents for different plant genes. One of their major points is that many Agbiotech companies were once pesticide producers and switched over to biotech only because ofpotential profits.
Consumer safety As discussed in other areas of this project, there are many who feel that GM foods are a very real danger to human health, while others disagree, asserting that there is no link between GM foods and illness. Greenpeace would have to disagree with the later, as they feel that the unknown dangers and mysteries behind GE crops make them too risky to be widely marketed. Consumer Awareness/Labeling One of Greenpeace’s biggest objections to GE is the lack of consumer awareness of the presence of GMO’s in processed foods. They claim that there could be GMO’s in almost all products purchased at the grocery store, but consumers are unaware because companies are not required to label foods as GM. There is no legislation in the United States that requires food manufacturers to label foods as containing GMOs, and according to Greenpeace, “In Spring 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that labeling of GE foods would remain voluntary.” It makes sense that companies would be reluctant to voluntarily label foods as GM, considering the negative associations the public has with the potential dangers of GMO’s. In addition, Greenpeace mentions that “The United States may soon be the only country in the world that does not require labeling of genetically engineered food.” |